How should continuous prose answers be evaluated according to guidelines?

The evaluation of continuous prose answers is primarily focused on marking them positively for correctness. This means that the responses should be assessed based on how accurately they address the question and the relevance of the content provided. Evaluators look for correct information, logical reasoning, and the appropriate use of terminology as key indicators of a well-structured answer.

While factors like grammar, spelling, readability, and required content are also important and can influence the overall quality of a response, the main criterion for evaluation centers on correctness. This ensures that students are rewarded for their understanding and ability to convey correct information clearly and effectively, which is crucial in technical disciplines like building services engineering.

Emphasizing correctness encourages students to focus on understanding the subject matter comprehensively rather than merely adhering to structural or grammatical rules. This approach fosters a deeper engagement with the material and ultimately supports better learning outcomes in the field.